October 29, 2009Doug Hadden
Don’t be fooled – Web 2.0 will go deep into financial software
Social networking is revolutionizing transactional systems like Government Resource Planning (GRP). Many observers recognize that Web 2.0 will affect the content and collaboration product space in business and government. Some see applicability within the Customer Relationship Management (CRM) and Human Resource Management (HRM) product spaces. But not transactional systems. Surely not financial management!
I’m not talking about a superficial use of Web 2.0 user interface concepts. Or widgets. I’m talking about fundamental deep integration between transactional and social networking software. At the core. Not an interface or a portal. Core. From the basic design.
We looked at public financial management trends in 2005. We found an increased interest in integrating financial and records management systems. We analyzed our feature requests. Over half of these requests covered content or collaboration. The ability to attach documents at points in a transaction cycle. The ability to narrate decisions made in the budget cycle. We realized that an effective 21st Century GRP system required integrating transactional, collaboration and content systems. To improve government results. We built some use cases as part of the design for the FreeBalance Accountability Platform.
Tim O’Rielly had just defined Web 2.0. We realized that traditional financial applications did not integrate well with content and collaboration. It was, and remains, difficult for someone to decypher a government story. Yet, it was easy to follow the history of discussions in a blog.
This realization – that Web 2.0 was going to fundamentally change our business – enabled us to design a Government 2.0 / Government Resource Planning platform. It’s true that the first software applications delivered on this platform focus on functional transactional completeness. Stay tuned. We plan to leverage this fundamental architecture more and more.
I still encounter financial and technical experts who question how Web 2.0 can apply to GRP. Or why GRP needs Web 2.0. With all the excitement about collaboration in government through social networking, it is possible to lose sight of the end game.
Latest posts by Doug Hadden (see all)
- How can Wellbeing Science improve Government Policy? - March 22, 2017
- Do Policy-Makers need a Definition of Happiness? - March 21, 2017
- The Science of the Happy Workplace - March 21, 2017
- What are the Implications of Happiness Science? - March 20, 2017