August 15, 2012Doug Hadden
Doug Hadden, VP Products
I referred earlier last week to an on-going dispute between social enterprises and the attempt by Salesforce.com to trademark the term “social enterprise“. Companies that use social technology are not “social enterprises”. Companies that have products and services to address social problems are “social enterprises” – as they have been for over a decade according to the UK Social Enterprise Coalition.
It all seem silly when you think that Salesforce has strong support for non-profits and wide adoption among social enterprises (i.e. UK Social Enterprise Coalition and FreeBalance for starters.)
But, it’s mind boggling to think that Salesforce doesn’t want to engage the community socially on social media. That’s Salesforce – the company that is trying to tout social, social collaboration, social integration, mobile social, social gamification etc. Irony has no bounds.
Ironic given that Salesforce is a CRM company and is giving up the opportunity to engage a community and drive sales. (Perhaps after admitting that someone didn’t look at Wikipedia.)
Case in point: there’s a hash tag and logo with active tweeting – #notinourname.
Case in point: I responded to an interesting post on the Salesforce blog with ideas about the intersection of business process and social and added my view on this issue. The first part was answered. Despite additional comments around social enterprise: silence (so far).
Case in point: video to draw out Marc Benioff. Maybe it would be more exciting for Benioff to consider whether it is the “true social enterprise” or “false social enterprise” a la “false cloud” controversy.
How social is this protest? How global? (We’re global.) My sense is that there is social momentum. And, it’s not helping the Salesforce brand.
Latest posts by Doug Hadden (see all)
- The (IT) Project was a Success, but the Patient Died [Part 2] - September 21, 2016
- The (IT) Project was a Success, but the Patient Died [Part 1] - September 20, 2016
- Have we over-complicated the ‘smart’ in smart government? - September 8, 2016
- Why PFM reform is integral to smart government - September 8, 2016